*waving* Hi Nick. Yes Nick, but I know your site and unless it has changed that much in the past year and a half, it was a FB2 site that incorporated a lot of no no's (such as display code in the switch).
In Fb4 you don't need to use the CFModule, just throw another Fuseaction into the Queue, also with the parsed files (compile per se), the core files don't load themselves mostly unless you are in development, or a parsed file doesn't exist for some reason. FB4 is much much faster then FB3. >We have a fairly large site, and we have begun to componentize a lot >of the web controls such as select drop-down lists, partial displays, >and any other functions that are useable. All these components are >being called by cfmodule routed back through the index (core file), >since they are organized in separate circuits. So on a large dsp page, >we could have as much as 5 to 10 cfmodule calls, pulling displays, >menus, and other web controls components. The overhead of the core >file is now noticeable. > >We're using cf5. > > >Nick Han > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/03 11:20AM >>> >Hey everyone, > >Some co-workers have asked me for some pros and cons to Fusebox 4 or >Fusebox in general. >I polled the Fusebox list awhile back and obviously got some biased >results... anyone care to chime in.... I guess im really looking for >some cons as I have a decent list of pros. > >Thanks, > >Mike ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
