>Oooooooh... ensuring that FB3 apps can migrate smoothly over >being the primary goal (asside from consistency across >multiple languages)... that makes a lot more sense to me now. :) >
You sure that's what he meant? I took it to mean versions *of Mach-II*, not Fusebox versions. One common misconception that seems to be propagating is that Fusebox is Mach-II, and they're not even close. I don't see how they could have written Mach-II to work with FB3 (or even FB4 for that matter). Although, if I'm wrong, I'd certainly like to be corrected!! Regards, Dave. _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
