I imagine part of the reason why Macromedia labs are missing applications that show no gains or even negative gains is the same reason they missed them with CFMX; Macromedia provides no IP protection for the applications shared. It is quite likely that a fair number of complex and important applications aren't seen by Macromedia for exactly this reason.
-Matt On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 06:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Something definitely wrong here. Can you post some code (or send to > me privately seperately) that exhibits no gain? > > We'd love to dissect this in the lab to see what's happening. > > If you can zip it up with reproduction instructions, and send it to me > at [EMAIL PROTECTED], that'd be great. > > Also, if you could describe how you tested (load test tool, > conditions, etc), measured results, and what your findings were, plus > your config settings (remember that the CFMX settings are no longer > optimal for CFMX 6.1), that would be fantastic. > > Looking forward to drilling into this. In most cases, you should > expect anywhere from 40-160% gain from CFMX under load on a 2-proc > machine after re-tuning Sim Req. > > Damon > > >> Are those quick stats for the standard implementation of for J2EE? >> >> I've upgraded to 6.1 on Win 2K Advanced Server using standard >> implementation >> and am not seeing any speed improvement over MX?? >> >> How about others? any noticeable difference? >> >> Cheers >> >> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. >> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development >> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. >> t. 250.920.8830 >> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Macromedia Associate Partner >> www.macromedia.com >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group >> Founder & Director >> www.cfug-vancouverisland.com >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tim Buntel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 6:35 AM >> Subject: ColdFusion MX Performance Brief now available >> >> >>> Hello All - >>> >>> I'm pleased to inform you that the new Performance Brief for >>> ColdFusion MX >> 6.1 is now available. It can be downloaded from the CF Data Sheets >> and >> White Papers page ( >> http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/index.html >> <http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/ >> index.html> ) or >> directly from ( >> http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/6_1/ >> cfmx61_per >> formancebrief.pdf >> <http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/6_1/ >> cfmx61_pe >> rformancebrief.pdf> ). >>> >>> As you know, performance and stability improvements were one of the >>> top >> priorities for this release of ColdFusion. This document clearly >> proves >> that that goal was accomplished. Some quick numbers: >>> >>> * Windows 2000: Approximately 23 times faster than ColdFusion 4.5, 3 >>> times >> faster than ColdFusion 5, and 2.5 times faster than ColdFusion MX >>> * Windows 2003: Approximately 3 times faster than ColdFusion 5 >>> * Linux: Approximately 5 times faster than ColdFusion 5 >>> * Solaris: Approximately 4 times faster than ColdFusion 5 >>> * Dynamic email delivery capability increased as much as 50 times >>> more >> than CF 5. >>> >>> The document also explains some of the engineering work that went >>> into >> achieving these dramatic improvements. Nearly one hundred customer >> applications consisting of approximately 2.4 million lines of CFML >> code were >> used for analyzing CFML usage patterns and to look for bottlenecks in >> real-world customer settings. Where issues were revealed, the server >> runtime code was then tuned to eliminate them, resulting in dramatic >> cumulative effect. >>> >>> For even more details about the under-the-covers engineering work >>> that >> made these gains possible, be sure to read Jim Schley's excellent >> DevNet >> article, Performance Under the Covers in ColdFusion MX 6.1 at >> http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/ >> performance_61.html >> <http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/ >> performance_61.html >>> >>> >>> If you're still running ColdFusion 4.5 or 5 (or ColdFusion MX 6.0), >>> please >> check this out! The performance gains alone would be a compelling >> reason to >> move to CFMX 6.1 - but when you combine them with the new features >> they've >> been missing (CFC's, XML, Web Services, Flash Remoting), and the new >> features in 6.1 (like support for multiple server instances), it's >> easy to >> see why we've been calling this a must-have upgrade. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> Tim Buntel >>> Product Manager >>> Macromedia ColdFusion Server >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> Macromedia Inc. >>> 275 Grove Street >>> Newton, MA 02466 >>> >>> Phone: 617-219-2375 >>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
