I believe that if DW indeed matched CFS's feature set, that would be sufficient for every CFS user.
The strange thing is that many of the missing pieces aren't even CF specific, and that's the real crux of the DW acceptance challenge. I bet if everyone listed what keeps them using CF Studio, we would be surprised to find that most of it has nothing to do with CF and would benefit ASP, PHP, and developers in other languages as well!. Such as SQL highlighting... :) - Calvin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:02 PM Subject: RE: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us? <snip> > If Dreamweaver did everything that CF Studio did, and other "designers' > solutions" stuff as well, would you be happy with that? I think that's > Macromedia's goal. I think it's useful to chart Microsoft's progress with > Visual Studio as a comparison. When they started out, Visual Studio was > pretty bad - it was basically a bunch of IDEs bundled together. Today, > VS.NET 2003 is a very slick editor for any .NET programming you're doing - > ASP.NET, traditional Windows applications, etc. <snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com
