Many hardware devices make use of web application servers for various 
reasons. The best example I can give is networking equipment, which is 
now generally managed via a web interface provided by the device. It is 
also my understanding that Java is used heavily in this area.

-Matt

On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 04:47 PM, Bryan Stevenson wrote:

> Hmmm...OK..so why even build a web app....why not build a 
> client/server app?
> I guess knowing what they do would help....but anyways...back to work 
> ;-)
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> t. 250.920.8830
> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Macromedia Associate Partner
> www.macromedia.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
> Founder & Director
> www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Wilker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:11 PM
> Subject: RE: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us?
>
>
>> Nope they are independent. That's why CF is not cost effective. Were 
>> they
> to
>> connect to a single server there wouldn't be a problem
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:44 PM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: Re: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us?
>>
>>
>> Well if your little devices are using web apps why would you need a
> licence
>> per device?  Do these devices not connect to a web server that is 
>> serving
> up
>> these apps?  Wouldn't you only need a licence for that server?
>>
>> Perhaps I missed something.
>>
>> Oh ya...and there are cheap versions (Standard)...and as Matt L.
>> said....BlueDragon
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
>> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
>> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
>> t. 250.920.8830
>> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> Macromedia Associate Partner
>> www.macromedia.com
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
>> Founder & Director
>> www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Wilker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:38 PM
>> Subject: RE: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us?
>>
>>
>>> Exactly Matt,
>>>
>>> Whenever the topic of which app server to go to price has almost
>>> always
>> been
>>> what kills CF in my experience. When money is no option it's fine, 
>>> but
>> money
>>> is more and more becoming the object.
>>>
>>> It's one thing to say CF is still cheaper than BEA or whatever on a
>>> per
>> CPU
>>> type of deal, but the small shop that has a single CPU webserver,
>>> doesn't really car that they are saving money compared to the BEA
>>> licenses they're not interested in.
>>>
>>> The one thing (I've said it before) that I'd love to see would be 
>>> some
>> sort
>>> of low cost version of CF (no verity, maybe less DB support, maybe no
>>> sandboxes and such) that can be used on devices that use a web app. 
>>> My
>>> company sells such devices and I'd love it if all of them ran CF 
>>> apps,
>>> but 1k - 5k per unit is way too much for software. (Our units also
>>> only have
>> one
>>> CPU)
>>>
>>> I wish I could propose a model that lets MACR charge less or nothing
>>> for
>> MM
>>> but I know they need to make money.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Matt Blatchley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:06 PM
>>> To: CF-Talk
>>> Subject: RE: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us?
>>>
>>>
>>> I would think one reason is the cost of the CFServer.  Every person
>>> I've talked to that is outside of the CF development world tells me
>>> the reason they never got into ColdFusion or don't get into it is
>>> because of the
>> cost.
>>> Although I really enjoy CF, PHP and MySQL are basically free.  It's
>>> very difficult to convince someone to switch from paying nothing to
>>> having to dump thousand into just owning the license.  Then having to
>>> pay for the
>> pipe
>>> and servers on top of the CFlicense costs.  Although we are all aware
>>> of
>> the
>>> numerous ways to cut the costs like leasing the license, it still
>>> deters people for making the jump.  Just my experience when I work
>>> with ASP, PHP, and JSP folks.  The competition is too much for MM 
>>> when
>>> the competitors products are free, even with the capability issues
>>> that the others don't offer.
>>>
>>> My2cents
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:51 PM
>>> To: CF-Talk
>>> Subject: Re: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us?
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, just take a look at MM's SEC filings. They detail what product
>>> lines produced what revenues. Generally speaking, the documents lump
>>> all server-side software sales together, so one could make the
>>> argument that
>> it
>>> is JRun that is actually shrinking and CF. However, having
>>> participated in the MM earnings conference calls, they tend to break
>>> down the sales
>> figures
>>> better orally.
>>>
>>> For example, from their 10-K filling...
>>>
>>> Our Software Tools products had net revenues of $270.1 million in
>>> fiscal year 2003, as compared to $242.5 million in fiscal year 2002.
>>> This
>> increase
>>> was primarily due to the launch of new Software Tools products and 
>>> new
>>> versions of existing Software Tools products, including our MX family
>>> of products and Macromedia Contribute. Macromedia Studio MX, which 
>>> was
>> launched
>>> in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, represented approximately
>>> 31% of our net revenues in the current fiscal year. While sales of
>>> Macromedia Studio MX did result in a decrease in sales of our
>>> stand-alone products
>> that
>>> are included in our Studio MX bundle, aggregate sales from all of our
>>> MX products increased by 13% in fiscal year 2003 as compared to 
>>> fiscal
>>> year 2002. This increase was partially offset by a decline in net
>>> revenues from our Server Software products, primarily Macromedia
>>> ColdFusion MX. Server Software product revenues decreased to $53.0
>>> million in fiscal year 2003,
>> as
>>> compared to $60.1 million in fiscal year 2002. This decrease was
>>> primarily due to continued pricing pressures resulting from a very
>>> competitive
>> market
>>> environment, partially offset by releases of new versions of existing
>>> products during the current fiscal year.
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 02:38 PM, Tyler Silcox wrote:
>>>
>>>> Matt wrote: The market for ASP and PHP is growing, while the CF
>>>> market is shrinking.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any evidence of this, or is it a personal
>>>> observation/opinion? (I'm not challenging you, I just have a
>>>> professional curiosity...)
>>>>
>>>> Tyler
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:48 PM
>>>> To: CF-Talk
>>>> Subject: Re: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us?
>>>>
>>>>> Granted, I pretty much stopped using DW when MX rolled out, but
>>>>> lots of people love it. You can't expect MM to stop schmoozing it's
>>>>> pre-existing customer base and ONLY focus on CF. Seriously now, you
>>>>> don't want all those ASP and PHP folks spending their money
>>>>> somewhere else - the beauty of it is that all of those people who
>>>>> buy DW and use it to code PHP and ASP are contributing to the
>>>>> future of MM and CF with their funds.
>>>>>
>>>> I disagree with the above statement. The market for ASP and PHP is
>>>> growing, while the CF market is shrinking. Certainly, there is
>>>> reason right now for Macromedia to support ASP, PHP, and CF, but at
>>>> what point does the size of
>>>> each respective market force MM to focus DW on only the largest
>>>> markets,
>>>> namely ASP and PHP?
>>>>
>>>> Matt Liotta
>>>> President & CEO
>>>> Montara Software, Inc.
>>>> http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
>>>> (888) 408-0900 x901
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

Reply via email to