> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 8:16 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: No so good news > > > But that's exactly what happens with OLE of Office applications - as I > > said before. > > > Indeed, but I am not disagreeing with you in that regard. I am stating > that if the technology of Windows Media Player (not the application) > was embedded in IE then it does not fall under the patent since it is > not a separate application controlled through IPC.
Then we're arguing different things. ;^) I'm simply arguing that the patent seems more broadly scoped than some people seem to be claiming and affects much more MS technology (indeed more general technology) than just IE. I'm pretty sure that you're correct about integration of Media Player - but it would, of course have to be an "IE that plays media" because integrating the MS Media Player application seems like it would fall under the patents scope. It's a syntactical nightmare... Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
