<cf_2cents> The arguement for & against HTML emails is getting really old...And in my opinion is has been beaten to death.
I think all the pros & cons that are needed have been given, and this thread should be moved to community or something. </cf_2cents> <cf_rant sarcasm="heavy"> And for all those arguing about the bandwidth...count the emails that have been created since the inception of this thread...then start counting up your bytes, and how many you've contributed :) </cf_rant> Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:14 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: (Admin) List upgrades > > > John Wilker wrote: > > > > Plain text is like speaking in a monotone. There is no > emphasis on concepts, > > ideas, etc.. I can't stand trying to get something across > when I don't even > > have Bold to work with :) > > Considering there is a better tag for EMphasis as Bold, I think > you have just explained why HTML is a bad thing with the current > state of email clients. > > Jochem > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
