I don't know about you but That seems like an aweful lot of work just to emphasize a word, not to mention wasting a line.
Jochem, I didn't get the point you were making. -----Original Message----- From: Mosh Teitelbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 12:18 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: (Admin) List upgrades Plain text certainly does *NOT* have to be like speaking in a monotone. ^^^^^ There have been standard conventions for emphasizing text in email/usenet for ages. -- Mosh Teitelbaum evoch, LLC Tel: (301) 942-5378 Fax: (301) 933-3651 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:14 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: (Admin) List upgrades > > > John Wilker wrote: > > > > Plain text is like speaking in a monotone. There is no emphasis > on concepts, > > ideas, etc.. I can't stand trying to get something across when > I don't even > > have Bold to work with :) > > Considering there is a better tag for EMphasis as Bold, I think you > have just explained why HTML is a bad thing with the current state of > email clients. > > Jochem > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
