Point being that many companies put their faith into CF, only to find out that it bombed at higher loads, or that it was just generally unstable, even in low load situations, or that some of the integration features didn't quite work properly. It was not a comparison between JSP (which is junk, BTW) and ColdFusion. -----Original Message----- From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 23, 2003 12:40 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Jrun4 and CFMX > Well, if you ever used CF3.0, which had NO proper way ... What was the point of that post? POS, indeed. My 2 cents worth: we've been using both CF and JRun for some time now. JSP, on its own, has nothing to recommend it over CF, except that you can deploy JSP apps on free standards-based software such as Tomcat (before anyone mentions BlueDragon, I don't consider CFML a standard). CF's built-in functionality is still way ahead of what you can do with easily/freely available JSP taglibs. It's almost the most productive platform it's possible to imagine. I would never dream of using JSP to develop a small-to-medium sized application or website, if I could use CF instead. However, if you're developing complex apps that have to integrate with multiple pieces of Java-based software (and there are some good ones out there), then imo it makes sense to minimise the number of technologies in your bag by going with a completely Java-based approach. It streamlines your source code base a little, which is always a good thing. Nick~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
