Thanks for clearing that up. In regards to user friendliness I can always use redirects.
The links are easier to create with SES.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Everland III
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:58 PM
Subject: Re:SES and Fusebox
There really isn't an issue anymore with any of the search engines indexing dynamic sites. Once google started doing it every other search engine had to do it or be forced out of business. The only reason I could even imagine for you to have SES urls is for user friendlieness, and with that you may want to look into something different than using Fusebox with SES urls. I mean think about it, instead of index.cfm?fuseaction=start.start you now have index.cfm/fuseaction/start/start, still long, doesn't really look to friendly.
Bob Everland
>Hello All,
>
>I am run into some issues using SES with a fusebox app that I have on
>windows 2003 on a shared hosting environment. I keep getting errors
>with IIS trying to locate the dummy file at the end of my url.
>
>My question is has anyone run into this problem? And is SES needed
>anymore with the advances that search engines have made in dealing
>with ?'s and other characters in the url?
>
>Thanks
>
>Mike
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
