> No, CF uses a castrated version of the K2 engine. God knows what
> they castrated, other than the # docs limit.

What makes you think that anything other than the maximum number of
documents (a licensing limitation) has been changed? I haven't found any
reason to believe this, although I can only remember one time where I worked
with a standalone version of K2 from CF.

> BTW, how many companies do you know that use the CF Verity engine
> successfully?

I know plenty, myself. That's not to say it's perfect (or even good), but it
is adequate for many, at least. It also has the advantage of reliably being
there for most CF installations, which can potentially reduce the
installation dependencies of CF applications.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to