From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 2, 2003 5:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Update Verity Collections Execution Time
> No, CF uses a castrated version of the K2 engine. God knows what
> they castrated, other than the # docs limit.
What makes you think that anything other than the maximum number of
documents (a licensing limitation) has been changed? I haven't found any
reason to believe this, although I can only remember one time where I worked
with a standalone version of K2 from CF.
I don't. Then again, I don't have any evidence that it's otherwise fully
complete other than the # of docs.
> BTW, how many companies do you know that use the CF Verity engine
> successfully?
I know plenty, myself. That's not to say it's perfect (or even good), but it
is adequate for many, at least. It also has the advantage of reliably being
there for most CF installations, which can potentially reduce the
installation dependencies of CF applications.
I remember having to index a rather small table with only 100,000 rows, and
by the end of the day the search would just crawl. I also didn't appreciate
having to schedule a bunch of jobs in order to optimize the collections.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
