> Neither are 99% of the web applications out there - look at yahoo or
> googles view source - its a damned mess! I think the lame preview
> function in java is a road block, but I think w3c compliance,
> unfortunately, is not really a factor.
>
You misunderstand my point. Currently, the JDK only supports HTML 3 and
CSS 1. Whether sites are compliant with the latest W3C specifications
or not isn't important. What is important is that any HTML renderer be
able to correctly render the latest W3C specifications. With support
for only HTML 3 and CSS 1, you will find that very few sites render
very well.

Our replacement renderer for the JDK fixes this by supporting the
latest W3C specifications. Now that is not to say there aren't issues
with it. For example, it does have a good bit of problems with
malformed HTML, but we hope to fix that in the future. And, with the
current integration of JTidy we are able to do surprisingly well now.

-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to