> > Neither are 99% of the web applications out there - look at yahoo or
> > googles view source - its a damned mess! I think the lame preview
> > function in java is a road block, but I think w3c compliance,
> > unfortunately, is not really a factor.
> >
> You misunderstand my point. Currently, the JDK only supports HTML 3 and
> CSS 1. Whether sites are compliant with the latest W3C specifications
> or not isn't important. What is important is that any HTML renderer be
> able to correctly render the latest W3C specifications. With support
> for only HTML 3 and CSS 1, you will find that very few sites render
> very well.
Ah, we are talking about the same thing then. The JEditorPane renders
html badly (I said preview but that is technically inaccurate).
> Our replacement renderer for the JDK fixes this by supporting the
> latest W3C specifications. Now that is not to say there aren't issues
> with it. For example, it does have a good bit of problems with
> malformed HTML, but we hope to fix that in the future. And, with the
> current integration of JTidy we are able to do surprisingly well now.
JTidy (and Tidy) is the bomb. I'll have to check out your component as
the Editor Pane is a thorn in my side :)
--
Vale,
Rob
Luxuria immodica insaniam creat.
Sanam formam viatae conservate!
http://www.rohanclan.com
http://treebeard.sourceforge.net
http://ashpool.sourceforge.net
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
