cannot avoid the situation. Not if they want to experiment, use other
vendors' products, or do anything else that they have to in order to produce
the best site they can. I don't think there's that much "ill will" in the
community, though I could be wrong. I'd hope that if anything, people are
curious as to why it's being used and/or what it is. Again, I could be
wrong... and again, if I were a big shot at Macromedia I wouldn't be very
worried about it.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2004 20:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II
> I agree with you
> that some people will make assumptions because of what Macromedia
> does in
> practice, and that's a sad fact of life that there's no way around.
>
Which is why Macromedia should have known better and avoided the
situation to begin with. For example, it would take someone of Sean's
ability very little time to produce a framework to meet their needs,
which would allow them to avoid using MachII. It is a simple
cost/benefit analysis, it is cheaper to create an internal framework
than the possible loss of revenue associated with ill will from the
community.
-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
