> distance and
> throw stones at it while refusing to contribute or become involved in
> improvements to it.��With Mach-ii, Sean is standing up as an
> individual and
> taking a role in it's development, not sitting back and complaining
> endlessly without contributing anything to it.
>
I don't see the point here. Are you saying people can only complain
about something if they are willing to fix it? When was the last time
you complained about something in CFML? Did you fix it? I didn't think
so!
Now it is one thing to complain always and offer no contributions, but
I don't see that here at all. I have heard before that Dave Watts and I
are considered by many to be anti-Fusebox. Do we not contribute to the
CFML community? Certainly I have complained about Fusebox, but have I
done so without contributing to the CFML community? I think not! And
for the record, I did submit at least a couple of bugs along with what
I thought the fixes should be to Sean in regard to MachII.
> It's very apparent to me that Macromedia does not officially support
> Mach-ii.��There will always be those who can't see that line, but
> then there
> are also those who don't understand alot of things.
>
And it is for that very reason Macromedia should have known better.
-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
