> a distance and throw stones at it while refusing to
> contribute or become involved in improvements to it. With
> Mach-ii, Sean is standing up as an individual and taking a
> role in it's development, not sitting back and complaining
> endlessly without contributing anything to it.
I find this a little confusing
Why would somebody contribute to something they don't use or dislike? If
people don't like the way the framework is laid out, or the way it's
designed to be built, then why would they try to use it, which they'd
have to do to add to it
Using a comparison, what you'd suggest is that vegetarians make meat
products rather than "throw stones" at meat eaters - you're suggesting
that they become involved in the industry to improve it rather than
complain about it...
I tried an early version of FB and it just didn't work for me - by the
time it evolved into something usable for my sites, I already had a
framework of my own which was heavily in-place - so why would I drop
everything I had spent years developing just to contribute to a system I
didn't use?
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
