> By providing people with creatives and cut-and-paste HTML, you can vastly
> improve your chances of attracting reciprocal links to your site.
Ok that makes since, make it easy for someone to trade links with your site.
> Don't plaster each of your sites with links to the others, and don't
> reciprocate links between the sites.
So you're not supposed to swap links with another site?
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: keywording for search engine hits
>Any good rules to follow for making sure that keywords are picked up by the
>search engines, especially without having the keywords actually render on
>the page? I've been hearing that the engines are getting smart about not
>collecting keywords from meta-tags - is that correct? What about putting
>keywords in HTML that's inside of a stylesheet or DIV that is hidden? Will
>Google etc pick those up? Any other good ideas?
>
Here's a great new article to help you out with Google (and, I would
imagine, other engines as a results). In short, it just got a lot harder to
boost your rankings:
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/brandy-google-update
Regards,
Dave.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- Re: CFFILE MOVE brobborb
- Re: keywording for search engine hits Michael Dinowitz
- RE: keywording for search engine hits Tony Weeg
- Re: keywording for search engine hits Kevin Graeme
- RE: keywording for search engine hits Philip Arnold
- RE: keywording for search engine hits cfhelp
- RE: keywording for search engine hits Tony Weeg
- RE: keywording for search engine hits Burns, John
- RE: keywording for search engine hits Dave Carabetta
- Re: keywording for search engine hits Matt Robertson
- cfhelp