>> From: Barney Boisvert
>>
>> I've personally taken applications from FB4 -> Mach-II and
>> from Mach-II -> FB4 for various reasons. And I even have one
>> that's actually a hybrid, because part of it is much better
>> suited to the event model of Mach-II, but most of it is
>> better off as FB (because it's simpler). In both cases the
>> backend didn't change a lick, which is at is should be.
>
>Maybe people should get together and product MachBox or FuseMach
>(depending on which way you see it) :P
Already done.
Look for the release of Mach-3, a combination of both FuseBox 4 and Mach-II. Framework should be out mid-July along with mailing lists, web site and documentation.
--
Alex
>
>----------
>[<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=t:4>Todays Threads] [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:164658>This Message] [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4>Subscription] [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=808.728.4>Fast Unsubscribe] [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/signin/>User Settings]
>
>----------
><http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=35>
>a7e9429.jpg
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
