Maybe I am just living in a hole, but I have never heard anyone say OOP is the original way to reuse code. It sounds like you are complaining that you took something someone said to imply an absurd idea, which by no means makes it true that anyone actually ever said that. Perhaps you can point to a place where someone has claimed OOP is the original means of reusing code?


M

Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>No one, to the best of my knowledge, has ever claimed Fusebox or Mach-II are the only way to accomplish this.

I was not speaking about Fusebox in particular, but about OOP in general.
And I did not say that OOP claims it is the only way to accomplish this.
But when everybody says "OOP allows or enables, or whatever, re-using the code", it promotes the idea that
no code was re-used before, and THIS is just not true. OPP makes re-using code just a bit more systematic,
no more, and good programers will still re-use code just as before, and even with OOP, bad programmers may not.

--
_______________________________________
See some cool custom tags here:
http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
---------------------------------
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to