-Matt
On May 27, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Alexander Sherwood wrote:
> At 12:59 PM 5/27/2004, you wrote:
> >> From: Barney Boisvert
> >>
> >> I've personally taken applications from FB4 -> Mach-II and
> >> from Mach-II -> FB4 for various reasons.��And I even have one
> >> that's actually a hybrid, because part of it is much better
> >> suited to the event model of Mach-II, but most of it is
> >> better off as FB (because it's simpler).��In both cases the
> >> backend didn't change a lick, which is at is should be.��
> >
> >Maybe people should get together and product MachBox or FuseMach
> >(depending on which way you see it) :P
>
> Already done.
>
> Look for the release of Mach-3, a combination of both FuseBox 4 and
> Mach-II. Framework should be out mid-July along with mailing lists,
> web site and documentation.
>
> --
> Alex
>
> >
> >----------
> >[<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=t:4>Todays Threads]
> [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:164658>This Message]
> [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4>Subscription]
> [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?
> user=808.728.4>Fast Unsubscribe]
> [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/signin/>User Settings]
> >
> >----------
> ><http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=35>
> >a7e9429.jpg
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
