2000, and it will not scale up very well.
======================================
Our Anti-spam solution works!!
http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
======================================
----- Original Message -----
From: Chunshen (Don) Li
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: ugly truth
Thanks.
They are Dell 1550 for WEB server (IIS 5.0) and 2550 for Access 2000 (intend
to upgrade to SQL Server) (they have a total of 4 boxes).
And I intend to recommend installing CF5 on a box that has most RAM and Access
db on the box that has second most RAM.
>With 5 to 10 concurrent users the box will run, but will be somewhat kludgy,
>especially if the SQL DB is on the same box (not recommended)
>
>Recommended minimum RAM is 1 GB
>
>If the Existing RAM is ECC RAM, the upgrade will be around $450.00, but is
just
>DR RAM, the upgrade will be about half that to bring it up to 1 GB
>
>If they use Oracle DB, then the recommended RAM is 4 GB, minimum
>
>======================================
>Our Anti-spam solution works!!
>http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
>For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
>======================================
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chunshen (Don) Li
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 6:59 PM
> Subject: ugly truth
>
>
> One would never expect a production server running with 256 MB RAM but it's
>true I just found out from my client. The thing is it's totally beyond me
that
>Dell would roll out a machine with this little amount of RAM and label it as
a
>SERVER and sell to customers even three or fours years ago.
>
> Now, I can't dig up doucmentation on CF5's system requirement, well, on a
256
>MB RAM box somehow CF5 runs, but I would seriously doubt that with this
little
>amount of memory CF server would be able to handle SESSION locking management
>very well (even session vars are properly locked), with extremely
>query-extensive or heavy-duty queries, and say, with 5 or 10 concurrent users
>hit same page/request. What's your thought?
> Certainly I'm pushing my client to throw in more RAMs on the box.
>
> TIA.
>
> Don Li
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
