that equates to more traffic than many sites need to deal with. Who
cares about concurrency when you don't need it?
-Matt
On May 29, 2004, at 8:52 PM, Doug White wrote:
> It will be good to upgrade to SQL2k, because concurrency is an issue
> with Access
> 2000, and it will not scale up very well.
>
> ======================================
> Our Anti-spam solution works!!
> http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
> For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
> ======================================
>
> ��----- Original Message -----
> ��From: Chunshen (Don) Li
> ��To: CF-Talk
> ��Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 7:32 PM
> ��Subject: Re: ugly truth
>
> ��Thanks.
>
> ��They are Dell 1550 for WEB server (IIS 5.0) and 2550 for Access
> 2000 (intend
> to upgrade to SQL Server) (they have a total of 4 boxes).
>
> ��And I intend to recommend installing CF5 on a box that has most RAM
> and Access
> db on the box that has second most RAM.
>
> ��>With 5 to 10 concurrent users the box will run, but will be
> somewhat kludgy,
> ��>especially if the SQL DB is on the same box (not recommended)
> ��>
> ��>Recommended minimum RAM is 1 GB
> ��>
> ��>If the Existing RAM is ECC RAM, the upgrade will be around
> $450.00, but is
> just
> ��>DR RAM, the upgrade will be about half that to bring it up to 1 GB
> ��>
> ��>If they use Oracle DB, then the recommended RAM is 4 GB, minimum
> ��>
> ��>======================================
> ��>Our Anti-spam solution works!!
> ��>http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
> ��>For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> ��>http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
> ��>======================================
> ��>
> ��>
> ��>��----- Original Message -----
> ��>��From: Chunshen (Don) Li
> ��>��To: CF-Talk
> ��>��Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 6:59 PM
> ��>��Subject: ugly truth
> ��>
> ��>
> ��>��One would never expect a production server running with 256 MB
> RAM but it's
> ��>true I just found out from my client.��The thing is it's totally
> beyond me
> that
> ��>Dell would roll out a machine with this little amount of RAM and
> label it as
> a
> ��>SERVER and sell to customers even three or fours years ago.
> ��>
> ��>��Now, I can't dig up doucmentation on CF5's system requirement,
> well, on a
> 256
> ��>MB RAM box somehow CF5 runs, but I would seriously doubt that with
> this
> little
> ��>amount of memory CF server would be able to handle SESSION locking
> management
> ��>very well (even session vars are properly locked),��with extremely
> ��>query-extensive or heavy-duty queries, and say, with 5 or 10
> concurrent users
> ��>hit same page/request.��What's your thought?
> ��>��Certainly I'm pushing my client to throw in more RAMs on the box.
> ��>
> ��>��TIA.
> ��>
> ��>��Don Li
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
