>It will be good to upgrade to SQL2k, because concurrency is an issue with Access
>2000, and it will not scale up very well.
>
>======================================
>Our Anti-spam solution works!!
>http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
>For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
>======================================
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chunshen (Don) Li
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: ugly truth
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> They are Dell 1550 for WEB server (IIS 5.0) and 2550 for Access 2000 (intend
>to upgrade to SQL Server) (they have a total of 4 boxes).
>
> And I intend to recommend installing CF5 on a box that has most RAM and Access
>db on the box that has second most RAM.
>
> >With 5 to 10 concurrent users the box will run, but will be somewhat kludgy,
> >especially if the SQL DB is on the same box (not recommended)
> >
> >Recommended minimum RAM is 1 GB
> >
> >If the Existing RAM is ECC RAM, the upgrade will be around $450.00, but is
>just
> >DR RAM, the upgrade will be about half that to bring it up to 1 GB
> >
> >If they use Oracle DB, then the recommended RAM is 4 GB, minimum
> >
> >======================================
> >Our Anti-spam solution works!!
> >http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
> >For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> >http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
> >======================================
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Chunshen (Don) Li
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 6:59 PM
> > Subject: ugly truth
> >
> >
> > One would never expect a production server running with 256 MB RAM but it's
> >true I just found out from my client. The thing is it's totally beyond me
>that
> >Dell would roll out a machine with this little amount of RAM and label it as
>a
> >SERVER and sell to customers even three or fours years ago.
> >
> > Now, I can't dig up doucmentation on CF5's system requirement, well, on a
>256
> >MB RAM box somehow CF5 runs, but I would seriously doubt that with this
>little
> >amount of memory CF server would be able to handle SESSION locking management
> >very well (even session vars are properly locked), with extremely
> >query-extensive or heavy-duty queries, and say, with 5 or 10 concurrent users
> >hit same page/request. What's your thought?
> > Certainly I'm pushing my client to throw in more RAMs on the box.
> >
> > TIA.
> >
> > Don Li
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
