>> There are still a few things that are difficult (if not
>> impossible) to
>> accomplish with cfscript in spite of cffunction tags...
>> such as a
>> generic cfscript equivalent of cflock. Obviously there's
>> no equivalent
>> to cfsavecontent, and just plain forget using query
>> grouping for
>> display in cfscript.
> Query grouping is really not that hard in cfscript.
> Pseudocode:
> y = query.recordcount;
> for (x = 1 ; x LTE y ; x = x + 1)
> {
> WriteOutput(query.column1[x]);
> WriteOutput(query.column2[x]);
> while (x LT y and query.column2[x] is query.column2[x +
> 1])
> {
> x = x + 1;
> WriteOutput(query.column2[x]);
> }
> }
> But obviously the time you save with cfloop is more then
> enough to just buy more iron.
Well I was thinking of a reasonably clean/simple way to handle
grouping -- while this works, it's not really syntactically comparable
to <cfoutput group="column1"> <cfoutput></cfoutput></cfoutput> --
essentially what you just said.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
