Where has this been "thoroughly debunked"?
----- Original Message -----
From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: cfscript speed?
> It used to be rumored that cfscript was significantly more efficient
> than tags. With recent versions that rumor's been thoroughly debunked.
> I don't know how much truth there was to it originally.
>
> > When I started my job in February I noticed a lot of code
> > that used
> > CFSCRIPT extensively, often for minor things like setting
> > a single
> > variable. Is there a reason why this would have been
> > done? For
> > readability I've been changing them to the tag format.
> > --
> > Damien McKenna - Web Developer -
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ -
> > 407-804-1014
> > "Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus
>
>
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
