but according to Forta the difference was minimal. Unfortunately I
can't seem to find the article now... it seems like I remember seeing
it in CFDJ though I could be misremembering. I didn't find it either
in the cfdj archives or on his blog. But I remember reading it.
> Isaac:
> Where has this been "thoroughly debunked"?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: cfscript speed?
>> It used to be rumored that cfscript was significantly
>> more efficient
>> than tags. With recent versions that rumor's been
>> thoroughly debunked.
>> I don't know how much truth there was to it originally.
>>
>> > When I started my job in February I noticed a lot of
>> > code
>> > that used
>> > CFSCRIPT extensively, often for minor things like
>> > setting
>> > a single
>> > variable. Is there a reason why this would have been
>> > done? For
>> > readability I've been changing them to the tag format.
>> > --
>> > Damien McKenna - Web Developer -
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ -
>> > 407-804-1014
>> > "Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
