>> webservices?
>> Thinks its buggy and a pain to use? Just don't want to
>> use Axis
>> because you have a better idea? Write your own event
>> gateway for
>> webservices and that utilizes some other SOAP engine.
>> Want to
>> implement SOAP via SMTP which CF doesn't really do?
>> Write your own
>> gateway.
>>
> Again, with Java invocation of CFCs you could do just
> that. What about the
> event gateway makes it better?
Like all things CF, it's more accessible to people who aren't Java
experts.
After all, a structure is just a Java object. So what makes CF
structures any better than using the underlying Java object (which is
also available to us)?
As to the cf-admin -- I haven't needed webservices for anything I've
worked on yet, but as a rule, I prefer things to not be in the
CF-Admin... If I could get DSN-less connections with CFMX, I'd be all
over it.
Frameworks designed better in the community: yes and no. Although I
haven't used cflogin yet, I'm not about to rewrite the "application
framework".
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
