any sense at all. If you're joking, it's not funny.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alexander Sherwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:00:05 -0400
Subject: RE: BLACKSTONE: Software Development Times Article
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 09:56 AM 8/18/2004, you wrote:
>> matt, i respect your intelligence, i respect your message,
>> you are way off the scales on the iq chart im sure,
>> but....your delivery sucks.
>> if your personality was half of what your intelligence was,
>> man, im sure you could be president. i hope this doesnt
>> offend you, its not intended to do so, this list isnt the
>> forum for this, and i dont have the time for it, but please,
>> dont take offense, learn a lesson in people skills, it will
>> GET YOU VERY FAR!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> tony.
>
>And with that... Tony single handedly silenced the list. LOL
Nope.
If the gateway doesn't support FuseBox 4.5 circuits and the FLiP
process (not to mention .qry and .dsp files), then MACR should go with
Mach-II listeners.
Mach-II is really the best choice to build the forthcoming remote Java
--> CFC invocation event-based gateway, by far.
--
True________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
