> If the gateway doesn't support FuseBox 4.5 circuits and
> the FLiP process (not to mention .qry and .dsp files),
> then MACR should go with Mach-II listeners.

> Mach-II is really the best choice to build the forthcoming
> remote Java --> CFC invocation event-based gateway, by
> far.

Ummm... no...

Macromedia should do nothing to support any framework whether it's FB,
Mach-II, the onTap framework or anything else. They should build
ColdFusion to support (gasp!) ColdFusion and let us figure out how to
translate that into something we can use in our independent
frameworks.

The "best choice to build the forthcoming remote Java --> CFC
invocation event-based gateway" by far is Java and CFC's.

I'm pretty sure Macromedia sees it this way as well.

s. isaac dealey     954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to