>>HI,
>>
>>Does anyone on this list use the FLiP Methodology. I was
>>wondering exactly
>>what this is and what the benefits are of using it.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Mario
> Use Mach-II. It's really fast.
> Mach-II uses OO and the new MVC technology. FLiP is good,
> but compared to MVC, it's like comparing a Chevette to a
> Corvette.
> --
> A
I don't see the connection... FLiP is a methodology... it could just
as well be adapted to Mach-II as it would be adapated to Fusebox and
have approximate effect on your development ... Further arguments can
be made that it's faster to develop with Mach-II than with Fusebox or
other non-oo platforms. I disagree that there is a gain in terms of
development time _unless_ you are already familiar with OO and _more_
comfortable with OO than with procedural development. In all other
cases I would expect there to be a loss in terms of development time.
Other pros and cons of OO development can and are argued on their own
individual merits and make up the argument for or against moving to OO
development from an existing procedural model.
The preceding has been a public service announcement. :)
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
