my group at the company I work for basically uses this approach.  We
'wireframe' out an app.  Once the clients like it, we jamm out some
code under the premise of 'requiremnts will change' .

DK

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:12:10 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > HI,
>  
>  > Does anyone on this list use the FLiP Methodology. I was
>  > wondering exactly
>  > what this is and what the benefits are of using it.
>  
>  > Thanks
>  
>  > Mario
>  
>  >  <http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=3
>  >  6>
>  
>  It's a step-by-step process for taking programming project idea from
>  concept to completion which has been built primarily around Fusebox.
>  Some of the middle bits (identifying circuits & fuses, etc) could be
>  swapped out for any other given coding framework. The surrounding bits
>  primarily involve requirements gathering and suggest that the
>  application should be wire-framed and that the look and feel should be
>  completed before a single line of code is written. Once that's done
>  the clients sign off on the look and feel and the desired
>  functionality -- they can (and will) make changes after they sign off
>  on it, however, with proper documentation they pay higher fees for
>  changes made after this point. The whole idea really is to streamline
>  the non-coding portion of the work, to improve communication with
>  clients and thereby improve client satisfaction with the finished
>  product.
>  
>  s. isaac dealey   954.927.5117
>  
>  new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>  
>  add features without fixtures with
>  the onTap open source framework
>  http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
>  http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
>  http://www.fusiontap.com________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to