>>Ahhh, no, that's more apples to oranges. You can use FLIP
>>and never
>>write a single piece of fusebox code. BTW, MVC is not new
>>either.
> Right. Mach-II can make an apple faster with OO and MVC
> and CFML and CFCs than FLiP ever could with .QRY or .DSP
> files.
aaaaalllllllrighty then...
If you're talking about the performance of the application (rather
than development time), there's significant evidence to support the
idea that a Fusebox 4 application will perform better than a Mach-II
application which performs the same tasks.
The issue of development time is pretty subjective and varries greatly
from one developer (or team) to another.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
