> going to provide better integration and performance with SQL Server 2005
> than ADO.NET?
Is ADO.NET going to provide better integration and performance with
Oracle 10g then Oracle's own JDBC drivers?
Not to knock BD's .NET version, which I think is a great idea, but
integration is not always a good thing. Infact more times than not,
its a very bad thing. Right now I have to manage an entire intranet
that was 'tightly' integrated with MS products from ActiveDirectory to
SQL... and its a nightmare. The system is so shaky that if any if the
'integration' fails... then entire system goes down.
Needless to say its being ported to J2EE.
-Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: Nathan Strutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:33:24 -0700
Subject: Re: ms to no longer supporting msjvm
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vince Bonfanti wrote:
[...]
> further discussion. Do you really think a JDBC driver from DataDirect is
> going to provide better integration and performance with SQL Server 2005
> than ADO.NET?
As good as an argument as this is, take a look at Samba. In benchmarked
tests, Samba has beaten Windows 2000 and 2003 as a windows file server.
It's up to 2.5 times faster than native windows natively serving native
windows files to native windows clients.
Is ADO.NET better than our current JDBC drivers? Could be. Will it
always be? I wouldn't bet on it.
-nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
