Sorry for the duplicate post...the listserver scolded me for not trimming previous replies so I thought the message hadn't gone through.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:15:55 -0500, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Naturally, as with any programming decision there is a tradeoff. In my > experience, unless you have a very specific performance requirement, > the benefits of a framework in terms of maintainability, > standardization, and team development outweigh the very small > performance hit. > > That said, of course Simon is correct. A well-designed object model > will work just fine with Fusebox, Mach-II, some other framework, or no > framework at all. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185536 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
