Simon,

Thanks for your input.
I do believe you are right.  However, the company I work for is looking to 
adopt a widely used methodology, so that we can implement some sort of best 
practices and maintain consistency amongst our developers and applications.

Since I was familiar with Fusebox that seemed the natural way for me to go, and 
then I took a look at Mach-II and that seemed even better.

Then my next logical step was to get familiar with them as much as possible and 
see which one to adopt and then start converting our CF5 apps over.  So I 
turned to my respected friends an colleagues on this list to aid me in this 
endeavor :)

So far I am quite pleased at how this discussion is turning out.
Cheers!
>I only feel it's my duty to mention that you can still develop CF Apps 
>in a timely menner without the use of FB or MACH II that do utilize 
>proper OO techniques... and that perform better, as well.  I don't want 
>to open a can of worms here, but thought I'd point it out.
>
>~Simon
>
>Simon Horwith
>Member of Team Macromedia
>Macromedia Certified Master Instructor
>Editor-in-Chief, ColdFusion Developers Journal
>Blog - http://www.horwith.com
>
>
>
>
>Brian Kotek wrote:
>
>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185534
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to