> S.Isaac Dealey wrote: >>>Ack! Strawman argument! You're picking on a "weakness" of >>>English rather >>>actually arguing about whether pluralisation is a good >>>thing or not. >> >> How about this: If you like to have singular named class >> names, the >> name of the class matches the name of the table and as a >> result can be >> automated. I.e. address.cfc matches the address table, >> contact.cfc >> matches the contact table and addendum.cfc matches the >> addendum table. >> >> If plural table names are used, there isn't consistency >> and as a >> result, class names must also be plural or there can be >> no automation >> between the class and the table.
> That is a red herring. Making my job easier is a red herring?! Damn! All this time I thought it was helpful. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://macromedia.breezecentral.com/p49777853/ http://www.sys-con.com/author/?id=4806 http://www.fusiontap.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:200961 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
