I fail to see what is wrong with Flashpaper, it has a smaller footprint and can be easily embedded in pages, and is supported by more browsers than PDF is.
- Calvin -----Original Message----- From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:28 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Bloomberg article Rick Root wrote: > "Macromedia's Flash Player, which displays moving images and sound on > Web pages, is installed in more than 98 percent of Internet-connected > desktop computers. By buying Macromedia, Adobe Chief Executive Bruce > Chizen, 49, is reducing reliance on his flagship Acrobat software, used > by graphics professionals." > > Aside from the ridiculous oversimplification of the flash player, no > other macromedia products are mentioned in the article. I'm just hoping that this will mean the end to the awful pointless abortion of an idea that is FlashPaper. Now that Macromedia as been consumed by PDF's creators, there's no need for an Acrobat killer. K. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:203261 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
