True, more would be helpful. But a unique identifier would serve the purpose of deciding which was entered last which I believed he asked... but only he could clarify that and since he's not responding with any input... :)
you calling Jochem a wookie? hehe -----Original Message----- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 8:04 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SQL Query Question > After all, what hes having trouble with would be "less > trouble than it' already not" if they existed here. I would expect in this case that having a primary key on the table he described wouldn't change the sql syntax much (if at all). I still like to have a primary key on these sorts of tables, but that's more of a preference at that point. Though I might have also designed the schema with two tables instead of one -- one table to contain the last entry and a separate table to contain all historical entries. It's hard to say without knowing more about the specifics of the app. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:207365 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
