>> "...because .NET 2.0 is based on Java 1.4 (thanx to >> Microsoft's recent re-license), whereas .NET 1.1 is based on >> Java 1.1..." > >Why is that foolishness?
Because it's nonsense. Besides the fact that .NET isn't "based" (whatever the hell that means) off any version of Java, I think your "knowledgable (sic) geek" meant that C#2.0 resembles Java 1.5. There are no equivalents to VB.NET and ASP.NET in the J2EE world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:207904 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
