Wasn't that supposed to be corrected already with the updated data direct drivers?
-e -----Original Message----- From: Russ Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 6:00 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX 7 Stability That depends what you do with it. On a shared server, where most customers are using MS Access, CFMX falls over horribly whenever any site overloads their access database. So from a hosting perspective, no it's not more stable. Our CF5 servers stay up much longer. Russ -----Original Message----- From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2005 06:23 To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX 7 Stability I have not heard a lot of other opinions or anecdotes about CFMX 7 and stability, so I would like to solicit comment from other users. What are your opinions/experiences with CFMX 7? For my part, CFMX 7 is the most stable release of ColdFusion I have seen to date. I know there are many variables involved in overall stability, that is merely my own anecdotal experience thus far. For the record, I am running CFMX 7 Enterprise in J2EE mode on top of JRun on Windows 2003 Server, primarily accessing SQL Server 2000 databases through CF's SQL Server drivers. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:213963 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
