what? I had horrible experiences with CF5 and MS Access. Had to have a scheduled restart of CF every night! I've never used CFMX against an Access DB though.
DK On 8/6/05, Russ Michaels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That depends what you do with it. > On a shared server, where most customers are using MS Access, CFMX falls > over horribly whenever any site overloads their access database. > So from a hosting perspective, no it's not more stable. Our CF5 servers stay > up much longer. > > Russ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 August 2005 06:23 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CFMX 7 Stability > > I have not heard a lot of other opinions or anecdotes about CFMX 7 and > stability, so I would like to solicit comment from other users. What are > your opinions/experiences with CFMX 7? > > For my part, CFMX 7 is the most stable release of ColdFusion I have seen to > date. I know there are many variables involved in overall stability, that is > merely my own anecdotal experience thus far. For the record, I am running > CFMX 7 Enterprise in J2EE mode on top of JRun on Windows 2003 Server, > primarily accessing SQL Server 2000 databases through CF's SQL Server > drivers. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:213976 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
