On 10/21/05, dan martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be quite unstable compared to 5.0. The performance also seems to > be worse, not better. Is anyone using this in a production environment?
macromedia.com was running CFMX 7 at launch and CFMX 7.0.1 at launch. It's happily serving up 40,000 concurrent active sessions during peak morning traffic and gets a lot of traffic overall. > I have migrated from 5.0 and am starting to regret that decision. There seems > to be an endless list of problems with performance and tags just not working. Contact me off-list with specifics. There certainly are some differences between CF5 and later CFMX versions - try running the code analyzer in the CF Admin which should highlight some of the main potential problems. The stability issues are most likely due to configuration / environment issues. I'll see what I can do to help you get up and running in a stable manner. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:221914 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
