I mean employability in a more broad sense than being an employee.

If you prefer, replace employability with marketability... :) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Inline frames a good alternative for creating web applications?

Not interested in employability as in "being an employee"...
I'm self-employed and plan to stay that way...can never be fired.
Does have its drawbacks, but for me it's the only way to go.

Rick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:03 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Inline frames a good alternative for creating web 
> applications?
> 
> 
> Additionally, learning Javascript when in a web appllication world, 
> can only improve your capabilities and employablity....
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Inline frames a good alternative for creating web 
> applications?
> 
> Seems like you're doing more work trying to avoid work.
> 
> - Matt Small
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:50 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Inline frames a good alternative for creating web 
> applications?
> 
> Thanks for the insights, Barney...
> 
> Question:  Can an inline frame be setup to trigger another iframe when 
> some action is performed that triggers it?
> 
> Not clear, I know...so...a scenario...
> 
> Three iframes on a page...click on a link in first frame, second frame 
> responds, and causes third frame to respond....like a chain reaction.  
> If so, would this substitute for concurrency?
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:38 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Inline frames a good alternative for creating web 
> > applications?
> >
> >
> > The biggest problem with using frames is concurrency.  You can't do 
> > more than one thing at a time (unless you have two frames, then it's 
> > two things at a time), which can be very troubling.  With Flash and 
> > JS remoting you can perform multiple concurrent actions, which is 
> > very useful.  You also get the capability to pass complex data 
> > fairly easily, and move a lot of your UI logic to the client-side, 
> > which results in a far better user experience.
> >
> > And don't think you can use inline frames without JS.  When the 
> > frame loads, you have to parse out the content that you need, and 
> > then rebuild the visible document with that new content.
> >
> > cheers,
> > barneyb
> >
> > On 10/27/05, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, all...
> > >
> > > I've been interested in building web applications that don't 
> > > require a page refresh for a few years now.  First Iooked at 
> > > Flash...didn't like it a few versions ago...and still don't.  
> > > Don't want to work with the Flash GUI or learn ActionScript.
> > >
> > > Now, along comes AJAX...everyone's excited.  But upon further 
> > > examination, to use it I've got to learn Javascript and other
> > technologies
> > > about which I know virtually nothing.  (And no...I don't have a 
> > > market at this time that would justify the effort)
> > >
> > > My question is this...why not just use inline frames (as someone 
> > > mentioned recently as their method for building applications)
> > to simulate
> > > "non-page refreshing" apps?
> > >
> > > I've used them a little, but not a lot, so I'd like some feedback 
> > > on what the drawbacks are to building apps using inline frames...I
> > can stick
> > > to Cold Fusion and HTML alone...no Javascript, no 
> > > Actionscript...sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > Can anyone point me to some online examples of significant inline 
> > > frames usage to build apps?
> > >
> > > What am I missing?
> > >
> > > Thanks for any feedback and guidance...
> > >
> > > Rick
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Barney Boisvert
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 360.319.6145
> > http://www.barneyb.com/
> >
> > Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:222496
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to