I personally don't like FB and wouldn't use it. But my own framework is
similar in some ways, just a lot simpler.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 November 2005 20:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Mach-II vs model-glue

Fusebox 4 was developed specifically for CFMX, and doesn't use OO or CFCs.
Just because it don't have the buzzword compliance doesn't make a framework
bad.  Heck, FB3 which was designed for CF4 is still a very viable framework.
Which isn't to say you should pick up a new framework (or three), of course.

I happen to like MG better than M2, but it's more of a style thing than
anything about the frameworks themselves.  I think MG is more helpful in
distinguishing what is controller code and what is model code (assuming
you're using an OO model behind the scenes) than M2 is.
 On the flip side M2 is older, and while I can't say it's necessarily more
mature (Joe's done a great job with MG), it's certainly not the newcomer on
the block.  But don't discount FB4 either; it's a very capable framework,
and I'd pick FB over MG or M2 for most things.

You'll also want to consider things like Arf! and/or Reactor for persistance
stuff, and Tartan and/or ColdSpring for some of you model stuff.  FB, MG,
and M2 are all UI frameworks, not whole-app frameworks (though you FB4 is
designed to support whole-app development). 
There's a lot more to building web apps than just the UI.

Bottom line, I don't think there's a way out except to pick a set of
alternatives, give each one a try, and see which one you like best. 
There's not much you can do with one that you can't do with the others, so
it's really primarily a personal style question, unless you're all about the
buzzwords.

cheers,
barneyb

On 11/19/05, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have decided it is about to upgrade my framework. While mine still 
> works great, it was developer prior to MX, so is not oo and doesn't 
> use CFC's
>
> I have been looking at mach-II and model-glue as my two possibilities.
> Has anyone used both and has any comments on which one they liked best 
> and why.
>
> --
> Snake
>

--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/

Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:224729
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to