I think perhaps you need to take a chill pill there Nathan, the rest of the world is not going to agree with your opinion just because you want them to, we have our own minds are are entitled to our own opinions and thoughts, and those are mine. Everyone who disagrees with you is not a troll, in fact Trolls are not real, they are fairytale characters, so I don't think I am going to worry to much about watching my back as no trolls are going to get me in my sleep, and I have yet to have anyone actually turn up on my doorstep who threatened me on a forum, if they did then they would get a shock I think.
Russ -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 April 2006 08:09 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Newbie Model Glue Questions Wow, way to post a troll message, Russ. Watch your back, the framework nazis know where you sleep... Nah, actually, it's cool to see differing thoughts on the subject, even though I disagree. My point of view, quick & simpe, is that oss frameworks create the opposite of vendor-lock, because the standards are published and agreed upon publicly, and there is (hopefully) plenty of public documentation. But then there is something to be said for new developers and OO complexity. Maybe we should continue Brian Kotek's blog entry on the list ;) ... oh wow, i just looked, it's up to 56 replies: http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/4/5/The-CF-Skill-Divide -nathan strutz http://www.dopefly.com/ On 4/7/06, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Model-glue and similar frameworks is great if you want to obfuscate > your code and keep your client bound to you for any ongoing work, as > only developers who already understand the framework and OO will be > able to understand it, which will cut most average web developers. > > Russ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 April 2006 23:34 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Newbie Model Glue Questions > > didn't see a reply, so, <bump!> > > I can try my hand though... > > 4) Yes, from what I can tell, it's a pain. Wait for Model-Glue 2 with > includes. Also, I suppose it may work to do XML includes... worth a > shot, huh? Check this page: > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/07/31/xinclude.html > > 5) No, you can make a controller for every event-handler if you like. > I make one for every grouping or category. Just add another controller > tag and cfc. > > > 6) Check out Ray's coldfusioncookbook.com site code... it's on his > blog somewhere, search for it. > > > (sorry if this is a dupe - we're having connection problems today) > > -nathan strutz > http://www.dopefly.com/ > > > > On 4/6/06, Nick Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can someone help me answer these questions? > > > > > > > > 1) I set 'refresh' to false in the <config> block, but it doesn't seem > > to work. The framework keeps reloading on every request. > > > > > > > > 2) As same above for 'debug'. > > > > > > > > 3) There can only be one ModelGlue.xml file per application. Is > > this correct? > > > > > > > > 4) If #3 is true, ModelGlue.xml file size can get really large. > > Wouldn't this be a pain to manage or maintain tons of event-handlers? > > > > > > > > 5) Are all CFC calls invoked through /controller/controller.cfc, > > which has references of business or other CFCs? > > > > > > > > 6) Lastly, would someone, who has a fairly large site in production > > that is using MG, be willing to give me a copy of ModelGlue.xml to > > look > at? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237227 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
