Ian, 

I do understand that if the files aren't encrypted that they could potentially 
be viewed/copied by those with access to the servers on which they reside, 
whether on the file system or in the db.  What I don't have from the client, 
and I don't think I'll be able to get a definitivee answer, is the required 
level of security.  I don't know whether or not they want these files to be 
unreadable by personnel administering the servers.  I'll definitely ask that 
question.

Essentially, I have to make a case for the approach I'm going to propose.  I 
would rather not store the docs in a database, but if there aren't major 
performance issues with this approach then maybe I will do it that way.  I 
would also rather not encrypt the docs and then decypt them while viewing.  I 
will push the client for an answer to that.  What's your take on the 
performance issues here?

Do you think the increased overhead involved with decryption of documents when 
a user chooses to view potentially 50+ documents at one time in a browser (if 
that's possible) will seriously affect app performance?  For this scenario, do 
you think the file system approach is better than the db approach?

Thanks, Peter

> Maybe I just don't understand the difference between the security 
> provided by SSL and the additional security that encrypting the files 
> and then storing them in the db will provide.
> 
> SSL will only provide encryption of the data while it is in transit 
> from your server to the client server.  Encrypting the documents 
> either on the file system or in a database may provide protection 
> against other personal that may have access to the computer system(s) 
> storing the documents.  These two options provide protection at 
> different points.
> 
> 
> --------------
> Ian Skinner
> Web Programmer
> BloodSource
> www.BloodSource.org
> Sacramento, CA
> 
> ---------
> | 1 |   |
> ---------  Binary Soduko
> |   |   |
> ---------
 
> 
> "C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!"
> - Cynthia Dunning
> 
> Confidentiality Notice:  This message including any
> attachments is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender and
> delete any copies of this message. 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:241964
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to