Thanks, James.  I understand what you're saying.  I'll just have to get some 
clarification from the client re: encryption.

So if I encrypt a document that is being uploaded by a user, I have to decrypt 
it, index it and then encrypt it again before I insert it into the database 
table?  Can Oracle really index docs individually before inserting them into 
the database?  I thought with SQL Server at least that you could either do full 
or incremental full-text indexes (timestamp required) and only after the doc is 
inserted into the table.  Would that mean I'd have to store the doc, update the 
full-text index incrementally using a trigger, and then somehow encrypt it in 
the table?

Thanks, Peter

> I'm more familiar with Oracle, which will index a PDF as long as the
> text is actually text (OCR'd or otherwise). If SQL server can index a
> PDF doc, then it will be the same.
> 
> Any tool that is going to index an encrypted doc needs to decrypt it
> to do so, or you need to index the doc before encryption. Either way,
> the index will be unencrypted so it will reveal the contents of your
> encrypted docs on inspection (albeit in an obscure way).
> 
> On 6/2/06, Peter Legg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James, another question for you...
> >
> > Do you know if scanned docs that are converted to PDF using OCR can 
> be full-text indexed and searched in SQL Server 2000?
> >
> > You said that encryption of docs prevents then from being full-text 
> indexed natively.  Are there non-native products that can index 
> encrypted docs?
> 
> 
> -- 
> CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
> http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.
com/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242114
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to