Yeah that can be true and is a good point. I really want to get into model-glue but I still remember something I read on here that was said, someone said that it was slow and the responce was yeah but it's doing so much underneath, but the user doesn't care what's underneath they want it fast.
I'm assuming this is more or less the frameworks that use xml or so it seems but then again I really haven't seen a .net app that's fast either. ~Dave the disruptor~ ---------------------------------------- From: Stephen Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:02 PM To: CF-Talk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Fusebox 4 Slow? dave wrote: > The thing I always hear about frameworks is about how much easier it is to > manage but yet all of them really slow down the apps for the end user which I > can't see the good of since a the apps aren't made for the developers they > are made for the users yet they are penalized so the developers can have an > easier day........ > I think what you are forgetting is that even if you aren't using Fusebox, Mach-II, Model-Glue, MVC or any other named application framework, then as long as you writing a well structured application with reusable code and all those other good programming techniques, whether that be procedural or object oriented, you are still using a framework... So basically you are saying all applications are slow and difficult to manage. ;oD ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242692 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
