Luis, > why you will going to change to the Alagad Image Component
I'd like to switch to Alagad mostly due it's CFC'ness and the fact that it's all native java within cf. Also, the 500 image limitation we ran into w/ imagecr3. Other than that, I have no "real" reasons. I plan to do the prudent testing and research against both options the next time this topic comes up. Right now, I just don't have the time. ImageCR3 is very good. Pros: fast, flexible, reliable. Cons: 500 batch limit, if you give it the wrong combo of attributes you can take down cf :( but that's stuff you work out in the development phases of your projects. If you are still trying to decide, download the eval editions of both and run some tests on the exact functions you need to perform. I'd be interested in the results. Justin Hansen Project Manager Uhlig LLC -----Original Message----- From: Luis Rueda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 3:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Image processing Hello Justin, i am interested in your experience, why you will going to change to the Alagad Image Component, at the time we will have the necessity to do some image manipulation and want to start with a good solution principally in terms of CPU usage and image manipulation speed, thanks for your comments. Luis Rueda Bizglo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:244800 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
